• VV old Statement

Posted: **Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:26 am**

VV thought I was behind a fake forum.. sorry vin, i don't do forums anymore.

**7/29/11 BEWARE ANOTHER COUNTERFEIT VINNIE VINCENT FORUM. This bogus site claims to be “doublevee” The same disgruntled individuals are the suspected source of this bogus site pretending to be VINNIE VINCENT in order to trick fans. STAY AWAY. Given the fraud regarding the OFFICIAL VINNIE VINCENT FORUM, an annual membership fee to the Official forum will be assessed to new members. Details to follow. **7/19/11 update! I just had a sneak preview of my OFFICIAL VINNIE VINCENT WEBSITE. It is about half way finished. It looks great. I am anxious for it to be completed as I know many of you are. I will keep you all posted. Vinnie Vincent **7/12/11 update! Sorry for the delay for all “pending” members. It’s taking longer than expected to activate the account process due to the longer than anticipated list of registrants. Thank u for your patience. **7/10/11 update! TWO new fake and fraudulent Vinnie Vincent “forums” (ONE OF THEM CLAIMING TO BE “OFFICAL”which it is NOT) and the other claiming to be (OFFICIALLY UNOFFICIAL) ) have popped up under a “similar” address and “look” to my Official “doublev.forumco.com.” THE ONLY OFFICIAL VINNIE VINCENT FORUM IS “doublev.forumco.com.” ALL OTHERS ARE FAKE!!! I believe the “imposter” responsible for these TWO fake forums is a former “member” or “whatever” of my Official Vinnie Vincent forum, “doublev.forumco.com” who I terminated a year ago because of bad faith actions which he apparently continues to display to this day; this time by …

Posted: **Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:27 am**

funny he punishes people for things he doesn't like.

Posted: **Tue Feb 28, 2012 8:06 am**

Grasping at straws.....it's easy to blame you for things Dino.

Posted: **Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:46 am**

Vinnie Vincent wrote: I believe the “imposter” responsible for these TWO fake forums is a former “member” or “whatever” of my Official Vinnie Vincent forum, “doublev.forumco.com” who I terminated a year ago because of bad faith actions which he apparently continues to display to this day; this time by …

Vinnie you got to have faith, faith, faith, BABY!

Posted: **Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:39 pm**

This update is an invalid argument. How does he know who the culprit is? On the internet, trolls and hackers hide their identities. The forums could've been created by anyone. Has he traced the forums to an ip address or an e mail address?

There are no details backing the statement. Didn't he do the research? Why should an audience accept anyone's claims without the facts to support them? This is a question often overlooked by the sender of a message.

Generally the standards of a convincing argument are:

*claim
* evidence (support)
* conclusion.

How are others to know if his suspicion is correct without information? Maybe he should stick to the facts, "there are fraudulent Official Vinnie Vincent forums on the internet. I haven't approved these forums."

That's my critique.

Posted: **Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:17 pm**

Exactly, KMA!

VV old Statement

VV old Statement

Re: VV old Statement

Re: VV old Statement

Re: VV old Statement

Re: VV old Statement

Re: VV old Statement